2.27.2010

it demands much.



"And to the extent that it can train viewers to laugh at characters' unending put-downs of one another, to view ridicule as both the mode of social intercourse and the ultimate art-form, television can reinforce its own queer ontology of appearance:  the most frightening prospect, for the well-conditioned viewer, becomes leaving oneself open to others' ridicule by betraying passe expressions of value, emotion, or vulnerability.  Other people become judges; the crime is naivete.  The well-trained viewer becomes even more allergic to people.  Lonelier.  Joe B's exhaustive TV-training in how to worry about how he might come across, seem to watching eyes, makes genuine human encounters even scarier.  But televisual irony has the solution:  further viewing begins to seem almost like required research, lessons in the blank, bored, too-wise expression that Joe must learn how to wear for tomorrow's excruciating ride on the brightly lit subway, where crowds of blank, bored-looking people have little to look at but each other."

--DFW, "E Unibus Pluram:  Television and U. S. Fiction"

No comments: